![]() Not trying to start shit - totally agree that free speech should be protected.īut at the same time, don't you think that the search engines (and social media, for that matter) have a RESPONSIBILITY to remove results that are proven to be "Bad results"? In this case, if someone is publishing misinformation or flat out propaganda that can easily be proven by multiple sources to be false, then why should it be allowed to show up in search results? If you'd like to stay free, give Google the boot, give FuggFuggGone the boot, give Bing the boot and go here: It was an easy transition and I feel like I'm not being treated like a child. Thank you Kershner for turning me on to Brave Browser. Regardless of how I might feel about Russia, I will not be told what I can and cannot read. I gave Google the boot in 2016 when they decided to take a political stance by curating search results to favor certain politicians.ĭuckDuckGo is FFGone for me now. So, on the news DuckDuckGo is going to censor "misinformation" about Russia from search results, I am divorcing them. ![]() We will not be swayed by a political fad to change our terms. We'll also remove posts that contain nudity and other things that are not typically found in business conversations, but we set these terms the day we started. DealerRefresh has one main rule: don't advertise in non-sponsored threads without being asked to do so. I appreciate it more when a company sets the terms and stands by them. What I don't appreciate is changing terms based on political fads. If a company wishes to make changes to its terms to protect its business, I can appreciate that. You're welcome to say anything under the tenants of "freedom of speech" and I strongly support that! ![]() Censorship that breaks with the 1st Amendment is a non-starter for me. The hill I will die on is the one where the Constitution of the United States lives.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |